Answer:
The Roman Catholic Church contends that its origin is the death,
resurrection, and ascension of Jesus Christ in approximately AD 30. The
Catholic Church proclaims itself to be the church that Jesus Christ died
for, the church that was established and built by the apostles. Is that
the true origin of the Catholic Church? On the contrary. Even a cursory
reading of the New Testament will reveal that the Catholic Church does
not have its origin in the teachings of Jesus or His apostles. In the
New Testament, there is no mention of the papacy, worship/adoration of
Mary (or the immaculate conception of Mary, the perpetual virginity of
Mary, the assumption of Mary, or Mary as co-redemptrix and mediatrix),
petitioning saints in heaven for their prayers, apostolic succession,
the ordinances of the church functioning as sacraments, infant baptism,
confession of sin to a priest, purgatory, indulgences, or the equal
authority of church tradition and Scripture. So, if the origin of the
Catholic Church is not in the teachings of Jesus and His apostles, as
recorded in the New Testament, what is the true origin of the Catholic
Church?
For the first 280 years of Christian history, Christianity was banned by
the Roman Empire, and Christians were terribly persecuted. This changed
after the “conversion” of the Roman Emperor Constantine. Constantine
provided religious toleration with the Edict of Milan in AD 313,
effectively lifting the ban on Christianity. Later, in AD 325,
Constantine called the Council of Nicea in an attempt to unify
Christianity. Constantine envisioned Christianity as a religion that
could unite the Roman Empire, which at that time was beginning to
fragment and divide. While this may have seemed to be a positive
development for the Christian church, the results were anything but
positive. Just as Constantine refused to fully embrace the Christian
faith, but continued many of his pagan beliefs and practices, so the
Christian church that Constantine promoted was a mixture of true
Christianity and Roman paganism.
Constantine found that, with the Roman Empire being so vast, expansive,
and diverse, not everyone would agree to forsake his or her religious
beliefs to embrace Christianity. So, Constantine allowed, and even
promoted, the “Christianization” of pagan beliefs. Completely pagan and
utterly unbiblical beliefs were given new “Christian” identities. Some
clear examples of this are as follows:
(1) The Cult of Isis, an Egyptian mother-goddess religion, was absorbed
into Christianity by replacing Isis with Mary. Many of the titles that
were used for Isis, such as “Queen of Heaven,” “Mother of God,” and theotokos
(“God-bearer”) were attached to Mary. Mary was given an exalted role in
the Christian faith, far beyond what the Bible ascribes to her, in
order to attract Isis worshippers to a faith they would not otherwise
embrace. Many temples to Isis were, in fact, converted into temples
dedicated to Mary. The first clear hints of Catholic Mariology occur in
the writings of Origen, who lived in Alexandria, Egypt, which happened
to be the focal point of Isis worship.
(2) Mithraism was a religion in the Roman Empire in the 1st through 5th
centuries AD. It was very popular among the Romans, especially among
Roman soldiers, and was possibly the religion of several Roman emperors.
While Mithraism was never given “official” status in the Roman Empire,
it was the de facto official religion until Constantine and succeeding
Roman emperors replaced Mithraism with Christianity. One of the key
features of Mithraism was a sacrificial meal, which involved eating the
flesh and drinking the blood of a bull. Mithras, the god of Mithraism,
was “present” in the flesh and blood of the bull, and when consumed,
granted salvation to those who partook of the sacrificial meal (this is
known as theophagy, the eating of one’s god). Mithraism also had seven
“sacraments,” making the similarities between Mithraism and Roman
Catholicism too many to ignore. Church leaders after Constantine found
an easy substitute for the sacrificial meal of Mithraism in the concept
of the Lord’s Supper/Christian communion. Even before Constantine, some
early Christians had begun to attach mysticism to the Lord’s Supper,
rejecting the biblical concept of a simple and worshipful remembrance of
Christ’s death and shed blood. The Romanization of the Lord’s Supper
made the transition to a sacrificial consumption of Jesus Christ, now
known as the Catholic Mass/Eucharist, complete.
(3) Most Roman emperors (and citizens) were henotheists. A henotheist is
one who believes in the existence of many gods, but focuses primarily
on one particular god or considers one particular god supreme over the
other gods. For example, the Roman god Jupiter was supreme over the
Roman pantheon of gods. Roman sailors were often worshippers of Neptune,
the god of the oceans. When the Catholic Church absorbed Roman
paganism, it simply replaced the pantheon of gods with the saints. Just
as the Roman pantheon of gods had a god of love, a god of peace, a god
of war, a god of strength, a god of wisdom, etc., so the Catholic Church
has a saint who is “in charge” over each of these, and many other
categories. Just as many Roman cities had a god specific to the city, so
the Catholic Church provided “patron saints” for the cities.
(4) The supremacy of the Roman bishop (the papacy) was created with the
support of the Roman emperors. With the city of Rome being the center of
government for the Roman Empire, and with the Roman emperors living in
Rome, the city of Rome rose to prominence in all facets of life.
Constantine and his successors gave their support to the bishop of Rome
as the supreme ruler of the church. Of course, it is best for the unity
of the Roman Empire that the government and state religion be
centralized. While most other bishops (and Christians) resisted the idea
of the Roman bishop being supreme, the Roman bishop eventually rose to
supremacy, due to the power and influence of the Roman emperors. When
the Roman Empire collapsed, the popes took on the title that had
previously belonged to the Roman emperors—Pontifex Maximus.
Many more examples could be given. These four should suffice in
demonstrating the origin of the Catholic Church. Of course, the Roman
Catholic Church denies the pagan origin of its beliefs and practices.
The Catholic Church disguises its pagan beliefs under layers of
complicated theology and “church tradition.” Recognizing that many of
its beliefs and practices are utterly foreign to Scripture, the Catholic
Church is forced to deny the authority and sufficiency of Scripture.
The origin of the Catholic Church is the tragic compromise of
Christianity with the pagan religions that surrounded it. Instead of
proclaiming the gospel and converting the pagans, the Catholic Church
“Christianized” the pagan religions, and “paganized” Christianity. By
blurring the differences and erasing the distinctions, yes, the Catholic
Church made itself attractive to the people of the Roman Empire. One
result was the Catholic Church becoming the supreme religion in the
Roman world for centuries. However, another result was the most dominant
form of Christianity apostatizing from the true gospel of Jesus Christ
and the true proclamation of God’s Word.
Second Timothy 4:3–4
declares, “For the time will come when men will not put up with sound
doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around
them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to
hear. They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to
myths.”
No comments:
Post a Comment